Unauthorized Trading

Unauthorized trading occurs when a broker or investment adviser makes trades or transactions in a customer or investor’s account without that customer or investor’s knowledge, permission or authorization. In most circumstances, unauthorized trading allegations involve unauthorized purchases and sales of stocks, securities, options or other financial products. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) Rule 2010, Standards of Commercial Honor and Principals of Trade, prohibits a broker or registered representative from making any unauthorized transactions or unauthorized trades in a customer’s account. Additionally, the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has found that unauthorized trading may constitute securities fraud under Rule 10b-5, as it is promulgated under Section 10b of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Investors are not required to accept every trade recommended by a broker. It is the broker’s responsibility to ensure that the customer fully understands the transactions and all risks associated with an investment prior to obtaining authorization to place a trade. Furthermore, it is the brokerage firm’s responsibility to ensure that their registered representatives follow all the state and federal law and regulatory rules, as well as the firm’s internal compliance policies and procedures, when making a recommendation and discussing investment trades with their customers.

Investors can protect themselves from being the victim of unauthorized trading by closely examining their monthly account statements, reviewing all trade confirmations and reading all correspondence received from their broker or investment firm. Trade confirmations will show the customer the details about each trade, including the name of the security, whether the investment was bought or sold, the date of the transaction, the commission and/or mark-up or mark-down charged, and the price at which the investment was bought or sold. If something seems wrong, the investor should immediately contact the broker or the broker’s manager.

Sometimes, when a customer complains to their investment firm, alleging that there were unauthorized trades in their account, the firm may deny those claims in a letter. One common defenses proffered by investment firms when a customer raises an unauthorized trade complaint is that the customer provided verbal discretion as to the price and time of the trade. Generally, brokerage firms may not defend an unauthorized trading allegation by stating that the customer orally granted discretionary trading power in the account to the broker. New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Rule 408(a) clearly requires a grant of discretionary power be in writing. The only exception applies to time and price discretion. A customer may orally grant time and price discretion to a broker, but such discretionary trading power does not extend beyond the end of the business day.

Additionally, it is crucial that the customer review all account statements and trade confirmations in a timely fashion after receiving the account statements and trade confirmations. In the event the customer detects an unauthorized trade, the customer should report the unauthorized trade to the broker and the investment firm immediately. If the customer waits too long to report an unauthorized trade, the investment firm may deny responsibility because the customer failed to object to the disputed transactions in a timely fashion.

Similarly, a customer should be aware that if a customer executed a margin agreement or an investment adviser agreement granting the adviser discretion, the customer may not have a viable unauthorized trading claim. For example, if a customer has a margin account and the value of the customer account falls below the broker-dealer firm’s collateral requirements, the customer may not have a viable unauthorized trading claim because the broker in that circumstance might be permitted to execute securities transactions without consulting the customer beforehand. Similarly, if a customer signed a formal agreement with the broker or firm granting “discretionary” control to the broker, empowering the broker to manage the customer’s account without seeking approval from the customer prior to executing a trade or transaction, the customer similarly may not have a viable unauthorized trading claim.

Our attorneys have extensive experience in representing customers with unauthorized trading claims and can formulate a strategy to potentially recover your losses from damages. If you have any further questions regarding unauthorized trading, contact our team at Lax & Neville to schedule a consultation.

New York Securities Lawyer Blog - Unauthorized Trades
Client Reviews
The Lax & Neville team were total professionals in handling our case. They've clearly had quite a bit of experience handling complex legal matters in many jurisdictions and courts. I was impressed with their professionalism coupled with persistence in arguing a very complete and well-structured case. I highly recommend their services. Anonymous
I am very, very happy with the outcome of my case and my experience with Lax Neville could not have been better. The entire team of attorneys and staff are real professionals, they always had time to answer my many questions about my case. I was treated with compassion and respect. I am so grateful I chose to work with Lax Neville. Anonymous
This is an official " thank you" for all your hard work. It really was a pleasure to have you represent me, and I enjoyed seeing you, Rush and Sandra in action. I think Lax and Neville epitomizes the phrase "quality vs quantity". I think I told you before that I spent a lot of time researching firms; in this case things worked out, I picked the best firm. I hope I never need your services in the future, but if I do I know I found the best attorneys for these types of legal issues. Anonymous
What transpired at the [redacted] was nothing less than a truly masterful and exceptional experience regarding your intelligence, professionalism, preparedness for my case, teamwork and erudite knowledge pertaining to Securities Law, FINRA and the SEC. The facility and ease of how the case was handled, the systematic questioning of all the witnesses to obtain the facts necessary to prove our case, the preparation of the critically conclusive information and documents, the commanding coup de gras closing argument and your tireless consideration and respect for the Panel and [redacted] was, is and will continue to epitomize my feelings and conclusion that what transpired over those long three days was nothing less than raw and unabashed brilliance. Anonymous
The New York Times
Dowjones Newswires
CNN Money
The Wall Street Journal
Thomson Reuters
Super Lawyers
Securities Arbitration Commentator