Social media and federal securities regulation

How often has a Facebook post led to a federal enforcement action? Actually, never. And Netflix CEO Reed Hastings is hoping his isn't the first case. Social media and securities regulation certainly make strange bedfellows and many are watching how the Securities and Exchange Commission will handle this new frontier of enforcement.

In the summer of 2012, Hastings posted to his Facebook account that Netflix subscribers watched over one billion hours of Netflix in June 2012. His profile had over 200,000 followers at the time. Nevertheless, the SEC claims that Hastings violated Regulation Fair Disclosure, or Reg FD, by providing "insider" information to his Facebook friends that was not available to the general public.

Hastings defends himself against the SEC's charge

Hastings responded to the allegation with a multi-prong defense. He said, "[f]irst, we think posting to over 200,000 people is very public, especially because many of my subscribers are reporters and bloggers."

"Second, while we think my public Facebook post is public, we don't currently use Facebook and other social media to get material information to investors; we usually get that information out in our extensive investor letters, press releases and SEC filings. We think the fact of 1 billion hours of viewing in June was not 'material' to investors, and we had blogged a few weeks before that we were serving nearly 1 billion hours per month."

Does the SEC have a legitimate case?

In brief, Reg FD requires that if a public company gives material information to one investor, it must give it to every investor to achieve the ideal of "full and fair disclosure." Prior to Reg FD's enactment over 10 years ago, public companies usually only released its forecasted data to select analysts. Full disclosure is now required. Many claim Reg FD actually stifles disclosure because instead of sending information out into the world, companies may choose to keep the information to themselves.

Sources close to the SEC's investigation say that the agency is not concerned over the use of social media tools like Facebook and Twitter, but over the public's knowledge of where to access the information. One solution for someone like Netflix's Hastings is to include a link on the company website that leads members of the general public to whatever medium is being used to distribute information.

Compared to previous Reg FD cases, the SEC appears to be overreaching in its claims against Hastings. It will have a hard time showing a Reg FD violation, which requires proof that the information was material and was released privately to a select group instead of all investors. The SEC's argument is weak. While full and fair disclosure is certainly important, it seems the SEC should focus its resources on more blatant violations and more culpable parties.

Steering through complex securities and investment laws

As Netflix's CEO, Reed Hastings has an elite legal team at his disposal to protect his and his company's interests. If you run a publicly-traded company or own or work for a securities firm, you, too, need expert legal representation. Contact a legal firm that specializes in securities and investment law to help you stay current on changing regulations and keep your business on the right side of the SEC.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
The Lax & Neville team were total professionals in handling our case. They've clearly had quite a bit of experience handling complex legal matters in many jurisdictions and courts. I was impressed with their professionalism coupled with persistence in arguing a very complete and well-structured case. I highly recommend their services. Anonymous
★★★★★
I am very, very happy with the outcome of my case and my experience with Lax Neville could not have been better. The entire team of attorneys and staff are real professionals, they always had time to answer my many questions about my case. I was treated with compassion and respect. I am so grateful I chose to work with Lax Neville. Anonymous
★★★★★
This is an official " thank you" for all your hard work. It really was a pleasure to have you represent me, and I enjoyed seeing you, Rush and Sandra in action. I think Lax and Neville epitomizes the phrase "quality vs quantity". I think I told you before that I spent a lot of time researching firms; in this case things worked out, I picked the best firm. I hope I never need your services in the future, but if I do I know I found the best attorneys for these types of legal issues. Anonymous
★★★★★
What transpired at the [redacted] was nothing less than a truly masterful and exceptional experience regarding your intelligence, professionalism, preparedness for my case, teamwork and erudite knowledge pertaining to Securities Law, FINRA and the SEC. The facility and ease of how the case was handled, the systematic questioning of all the witnesses to obtain the facts necessary to prove our case, the preparation of the critically conclusive information and documents, the commanding coup de gras closing argument and your tireless consideration and respect for the Panel and [redacted] was, is and will continue to epitomize my feelings and conclusion that what transpired over those long three days was nothing less than raw and unabashed brilliance. Anonymous
The New York Times
BusinessWeek
Dowjones Newswires
CNN Money
Forbes
The Wall Street Journal
Thomson Reuters
Super Lawyers
Securities Arbitration Commentator